1.Agree/Disagree

  Introduction

S is believed to + V. To some extent I agree with this view, but there are other aspects to take into account.

 Body 1

One key reason for prioritizing NOUN is that S+V+O. That is to say when S + V+O,S+ V+ O. For example, NOUNs Such as A, B and C+V. As a result, S + V+0. If it were not for NOUN, S + would/would not +Verb. Given that, S + V +0. Body 2

However, another idea against this is that S+V+O. In other Words, while S + V+O,S+ V+O. For instance, NOUNS Such as A, B and C+V. Consequently, S + V+0. If it were not for NOUN, S + would/would not + Verb. Therefore, S + V+ O. In Conclusion, although S + V+O, S+ V+O.

2.Positive/Negative

    Introduction

These days, it is becoming increasingly common for SOMEONE to do SOMETHING. l am of the opinion that this change might bring about two main benefits/problems in the long run.

    Body 1

One primary positive/negative outcome of NOUN/VING is that S + V+O. That is to say, when S + V +O, S + V+ O. For exanmple, NOUNS Such as A, B and C+V. As a result, S + V+ 0. If it were not for NOUN, S + Would/would not + Verb. Given that, S + V+0. Body 2 Another positive/negative impact is that S+V+O. In other words, whenS+ V+0, S+V+0. For instance, NOUNs such as A, B and C+V Consequently, S + V +O. Without NOUN, S + would/would not+Verb. Therefore, S + V+ O, In conclusion, while S+ V+O, S+V+O.

1. Discussion

   Introduction
   

People have different views as to whether S+V+O or S + V + 0. Both schools of thoughtcould be true in their own rights, but I agreewith the former view.

    Body 1

One argument in favor of NOUN/VING is thatS+V+O.

That is to say, when S + V +O, S + V+O.

For example, NOUNs such as A, B and C+V.

As a result, S + V+O.